![]() ![]() Since this is the Canon R forum, what if I hypothetically wrapped my head around a heavier system? The options would be to get an R8 with RF glass or an R8 with an EF adapter and use my EF (24-105/4 IS, 70-300/4.5-5.6 IS, 28/1.8, 50/1.4 and 100/2) glass. Have you considered the highly regarded Sigma 56/1.4? I wish Canon had introduced an EFM version of their 50/1.4. My 11-22 spends so much time on my M50 that I sometimes wonder why I carry the 18-45 (a less-than-ordinary lens, anyway). Too bad they do not have a lightweight wide-angle zoom (10-24). ![]() ![]() This is why I considered moving to Fuji, as they might be more committed to APS-C (think lighter and smaller). Not everyone is as concerned with system weight as I am. They might feel that the smaller sensor cameras would be the first to get cannibalised as newer mobile phones enter the market after all, the Canon R8 is "just" 100gms heavier than their R50. Knowing that the M system will not see any more progress caused me to think about shifting from the M system.Ĭanon (from what little I know) is more focused on the RF (FF) line than the RF-S line, with good reason. From what I can see, the M6 MkII is not available easily.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |